Venti, no foam, Fire and Brimstone, with two extra shots of espresso

Onward

Thu, 9 Feb 2012 21:18:47 -0500

For anyone who's looking for my more current blog, it's here: http://sluggo33.blogspot.com/. Thanks.

11-08-08_1355.jpg' width='420' height='336' align='left'> A damp and...

Tue, 11 Nov 2008 14:21:12 -0500

A damp and gritty ride today. How's u?

Test. -Jamie

Tue, 11 Nov 2008 14:18:09 -0500

Test. -Jamie

Shameless and out of touch

Wed, 29 Oct 2008 21:32:12 -0500

Unmitigated gall.

I don't know how else to describe the actions by Alaska Senator (R) Ted Stevens and Massachusetts State Senator (D) Dianne Wilkerson. Stevens was found guilty on all seven counts of trying to hide gifts and home renovations of more than $250,000, and has neither resigned nor withdrawn from the Senate race in Alaska. Wilkerson was just indicted on charges that she accepted nearly $25,000 in bribes from undercover FBI agents. She, like Stevens, is vowing to stay in the race for her seat - despite having lost the primary election, she's waging a sticker campaign.

Stevens was found guilty, but will appeal. Wilkerson is innocent until proven guilty; however, the photos of her stuffing $100 bills into her bra leave precious little doubt as to her guilt.

Breaching the public's trust is nothing new for politicians. It's been going on since the time of the first rulers. But the brazen lack of respect for their constituency displayed by Stevens and Wilkerson goes beyond the pale. How can either look in the mirror and honestly say, "Yes, I'm upholding the the values my elected position, and I'm looking out for those whom I represnt."?

It's one thing if you're a for-profit bank exec trying to maximize your company's profits, not to mention your own bonus. Misguided, criminal, deplorable - absolutely. And I hope the lot of them end up behind bars. Stevens and Wilkerson are worse, in my humble opinion, because they were elected to serve the people, not line their own pockets. Naive thinking on my part, perhaps, but I'd like to believe that those who are elected remember why they've been elected.

Oh, and, yes, I do believe that we should bring back the stock and pillory for cases such as these.

In the air...

Sun, 26 Oct 2008 00:55:41 -0500

...David Gergan, CNN political analyst and Harvard professor, on my flight from Chicago to Boston. He was in the last row of first class. Tall/big guy. He looked at me a few times when he was walking around, and I wasn't even talking politics.

I was, however, talking Wisconsin. Turns out that the guy seated next to me was from Wisconsin, and was at the UW while I was there. We had a good time reminiscing about Madison and Milwaukee. Plus, he confirmed the existance of the ice cream drink lounge that I recall, but neither of us could remember its name.

            Not something one sees everyday on Main...

Fri, 29 Aug 2008 14:32:29 -0500

Not something one sees everyday on Main Street in Watertown, MA - a giant inflated rat, with diseased belly, no less. Is there really that big a market for these, or is this a custom job that goes from labor dispute to labor dispute?

The orange-shirted picketers were protesting the contractor who's redoing the land behind the rat, I believe.

Unfit to lead

Fri, 29 Aug 2008 10:58:13 -0500

Presumed Republican presidential nominee, Sen. John McCain of Arizona, has selected Alaskan governor Sarah Palin as his running mate. This selection clearly smacks as a one-note play - designed purely to ensnare those followers of Hillary Clinton who are feeling put off by the lack of presence on the Democratic ticket. It's designed to separate the liberal/moderate female vote from the Democratic side, and give them a feel-good option on the GOP ticket.

So, on that level, it's a good play by McCain and the Republican Party.

However, I think it's something that falls into the "win the election at any costs, damn the future" column, rather than the "what's good for the country" side.

Look at the facts - McCain, if elected, would be the oldest sitting president - older even than Ronald Reagan. McCain's had a series of health issues, including several rounds of skin cancer. Being that the VP's primary job is to be ready to step into the Oval Office should the President die or become incapable of leading, I, for one, would be terrified to see Gov. Palin in that role.

She has little to no experience in governing. She's in her first term as Governor of Alaska, and is the youngest, at 44, to hold that slot. The Republicans like to paint Obama as being too inexperienced to lead the country. So where does that put Palin? How well-versed is she in global politics? Where's her economic experience? How does she feel about long-term energy development away from oil? (Hmmm, her husband works in oil on the north slope of Alaska, and the Republicans have been pushing to open up more of that state for drilling....) Can she effectively be the President of the Senate?

A dark horse outsider, to be sure, but one that I'd not want one heartbeat from the Presidency. I'd feel much more comfortable with Biden, despite his baggage, in that seat.

I see through this ploy by the Republicans, and I call "bullshit" on this hand of cards.

Going for victory at any cost, damning the potential consequences, does not a good leader make. Sen. McCain, you've lost my vote. And, I did vote for you in the primary.

06-17-08_1946.jpg' width='320' height='240' align='left'>

Wed, 18 Jun 2008 12:48:14 -0500

I <3 VT

Wed, 30 Jan 2008 23:16:43 -0500

A town petition drive in Brattleboro, VT to arrest Pres. Bush and VP Cheney has landed a spot on the March 4 ballot. With 436 signatures on the petiton, it reached the minimum requirement level of 5% of the town's population. That got it in front of the Town Select Board, which voted 3-2 in favor of it being on the ballot.

If that's not good old-fashioned democracy in action, I don't know what is. Some folks who had an issue wrote and circulated a petition, gained the legally required number of signatures, which led to a Select Board vote. Everyone followed the prescribed procedures, and now the town gets to vote on the motion. That's how it's done in America. It'll be up to the people of Brattleboro to vote their conscience. If they think it's a frivolous, stupid, or bad idea, they can vote against it. If they support it, the can vote in favor. That's democracy.

Now, some folks don't see it that way. One angry Minnesotan wrote, "Maybe the terrorists will do us all a favor and attack your town next, our country would be much safer with several thousand dead wackjobs in Vermont." He added, that terrorists could kidnap the three Select Board members who voted in favor and, "cut their heads off, video tape it and put it on the internet."

Another citizen wrote, "Be American, not a sniffeling (sic) liberal town that sleeps under the shield of safety provided to you by your President."

Ah, nothing like waving the flag and inviting harm to fellow citizens simply because you don't agree with their views. Now that's patriotism.

It never fails to amaze me how those who most vociferously claim to love this country, have such a limited and narrow view of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. Those are all well and good until they actually support something that a "liberal" wants to say or do.

So, I say, "Go, Brattleboro!" Thank you for this exercise in democracy.

The eyes! The eyes!

Fri, 4 Jan 2008 02:18:45 -0500

Recruiting volunteers from the undead may just be the ticket for Fred Thompson.

Scary, ain't it?

Well, the Iowa caucus is just about over, and the projections are as follows, as of 9:40 PM EST:

Huckabee taking the GOP win; and the Dems are all knotted up with no clear winner between Clinton, Obama, and Edwards.

So, does it matter?

Yes, no, maybe. How's that for an answer?

"Huh?," you say.

The reason that I can give that answer is that in the caucuses held in Iowa since 1972, if you exclude those where the sitting president ran unopposed, the winner in Iowa won the party nomination an even 50% of the time.

So, yes, it sort of matters, and yet it doesn't decisively make the call. It matters in that there's momentum for the winner heading into New Hampshire, but that's not always enough. Bob Dole nearly doubled G.H.W. Bush in '88, but lost the nomination. John McCain finished fifth in 2000, yet trounced G.W. Bush in New Hampshire. And, in 1992, Bill Clinton came in fourth in Iowa, with only one quarter the number of the votes cast for "Uncommitted," yet still won the nomination and the general election.

Huckabee beating Romney is a bit of news in that Romney significantly out spent Huckabee; however, Huckabee's play to the evangelical crowd may have done the trick in Iowa - not to mention the feel good, come-from-nowhere story that's been being spun about him in the press for the last two months. Will that carry over to New Hampshire and beyond? Perhaps a smidge, but not enough to win the Granite State nor the party's nomination. Despite heavy spending by Romney in N.H., my call is for McCain to take that state's primary once again, followed by Romney, then Huckabee. I feel that Huckabee will fall behind once more light is shed on his politics and his past. To my mind, he's the flavor of the month. Sooner or later, the press will turn on him, as they did with Howard Dean in '04.

As for the Dems, now there's a toss up. It's going to be an interesting ride, and then an even more interesting turn as a running mate will have to be selected. Too early for Corporate Satan to glean a winner. But, I will endorse McCain for the GOP ticket's lead spot.

AP Photo by Jeff Chiu

Venti, no foam, Fire and Brimstone, with two extra shots of espresso

Onward

11-08-08_1355.jpg' width='420' height='336' align='left'> A damp and...

Test. -Jamie

Shameless and out of touch

In the air...

&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Not something one sees everyday on Main...

Unfit to lead

06-17-08_1946.jpg' width='320' height='240' align='left'>

I <3 VT

The eyes! The eyes!

Not something one sees everyday on Main...